Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Prognostic factors for mortality and recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC: a Brazilian cohort study.

Created on 31 Aug 2026

Authors

Guilherme Gentile, Henri Luiz Morgan, João Victor Cagol Zorzo, Vinicius Daniel Faris de Campos, Francisco Valdez Santos, Fabio Pescarmona Gallucci, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro Filho, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, William Carlos Nahas

Published in

International urology and nephrology. Aug 30, 2026. Epub Aug 30, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the risk factors associated with mortality and recurrence following nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in a large Brazilian cohort.
This retrospective study analyzed 126 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC between 2009 and 2023 at a single institution in Brazil. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to identify factors associated with mortality and recurrence.
The median follow-up duration was 38 months. In multivariate analysis, positive surgical margins (HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.52-7.69, p=0.003), presence of carcinoma in situ (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.27-5.56, p=0.009), and systemic recurrence (HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.32-9.09, p=0.01) were independently associated with increased mortality. The laparoscopic approach was not associated with worse outcomes than open surgery.
This large Brazilian cohort study identified several prognostic factors for mortality and recurrence after nephroureterectomy in patients with UTUC. Achieving negative surgical margins and identifying high-risk pathological features are critical for optimizing the outcomes. The laparoscopic approach was not associated with worse oncological outcomes in this cohort. These findings may help guide patient management and follow-up strategies.

PMID:
42669104
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement