Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Interpretation of "Guideline for quality control of laparoscopic radical resection for biliary tract cancer(2026 edition)"].

Created on 31 Aug 2026

Authors

A Q Zhai, T R Lyu, F Y Li

Published in

Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]. Volume 64. Issue 10. Pages 1070-1076. Aug 31, 2026. Epub Aug 31, 2026.

Abstract

The publication of "Guideline for quality control of laparoscopic radical resection for biliary tract cancer(2026 edition)" marks the transition of laparoscopic radical resection for biliary tract cancer from technical exploration to a developmental stage centered on stratified indications, team credentialing, and whole-process quality control. The clinical value of laparoscopic radical resection for biliary tract cancer should not be evaluated solely by minimally invasive benefits, but should be established on the basis of strict patient selection, standardized margin assessment, adequate regional lymphadenectomy, high-quality biliary or gastrointestinal reconstruction, and standardized postoperative quality feedback. Focusing on the core recommendations of the guideline across different biliary tract cancer subtypes, this article provides in-depth interpretation of indication selection and team credentialing criteria, quality assessment of intraoperative margin control and lymph node dissection, as well as controversial issues such as the timing of surgery after conversion therapy and the choice of surgical procedures for mid-bile duct cancer. The aim is to promote the standardized, cautious, and high-quality implementation of laparoscopic radical resection for biliary tract cancer.

PMID:
42669443
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 31 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement