When morphology suggests a fusion: A pathology-centered escalation framework from histology and immunohistochemistry to RNA sequencing.

Authors

Miaomiao Jiang, Lupeng Ji, Hui Zhang, Chao Yuan

Published in

Annals of diagnostic pathology. Pages 152711. Aug 27, 2026. Epub Aug 27, 2026.

Abstract

Gene fusions have moved from ancillary molecular findings to defining events for an expanding group of neoplasms, with consequences for tumor classification, diagnostic certainty, and, in selected settings, targeted therapy. Yet the practical problem facing pathologists is not simply whether fusion testing is available, but when morphology should trigger it, which assay should be selected, and when conventional testing should be bypassed in favor of RNA-based sequencing. This structured narrative review synthesizes established morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular principles into a cross-cutting, tumor-type-agnostic, pathology-centered decision framework. We first summarize morphologic red flags that raise the pre-test probability of a fusion-driven neoplasm, including monomorphic spindle-cell, primitive round-cell, epithelioid/clear-cell, and secretory or salivary-like patterns, as well as unusual age-site combinations and morphology-immunophenotype discordance. We then position immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a triage layer rather than a molecular surrogate in all cases, emphasizing marker specificity, clone- and platform-dependent performance, and the distinction between screening and near-diagnostic surrogate markers. The relative roles of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), targeted RNA-based NGS (RNA-NGS), and whole-transcriptome approaches are compared from a diagnostic decision-making perspective. Particular attention is given to the potential role of direct-to-RNA testing in tissue-limited or fusion-diverse cases, pre-analytical limitations of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material, and the interpretation of discordant, novel, or multiple fusion calls. Finally, we propose an expert-derived, hypothesis-generating closed-loop escalation framework in which molecular data resolve morphologic questions rather than replace morphologic reasoning. The framework has not been prospectively validated; its decision thresholds and potential effects on diagnostic yield, tissue use, cost, and time to diagnosis require formal evaluation.

PMID:
42674962
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.