Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

External validation of prediction scores of positive random skin biopsy in suspected intravascular large B-cell lymphoma.

Created on 01 Sep 2026

Authors

Yushi Segawa, Akinao Okamoto, Sayaka Sumiyoshi, Hiroko Watase, Mitsunaga Iwata, Akihiro Tomita, Teruhiko Terasawa

Published in

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi. Aug 31, 2026. Epub Aug 31, 2026.

Abstract

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL), a rare but increasingly recognized aggressive extranodal B-cell lymphoma, often presents with diagnostically challenging manifestations. Three prediction scores-the Kameda, Okayama, and St. Marianna scores-have recently been proposed to guide the use of random skin biopsy (RSB) for diagnosing IVLBCL, but none have undergone external validation.
We retrospectively included 86 consecutive patients aged ≥15 years with suspected IVLBCL who underwent RSB between May 2013 and June 2024. The outcome of interest was a positive RSB for IVLBCL lesions. We evaluated the 2-risk-group classification measures and the 3-risk-group model performance.
Fourteen patients (16%) had a positive RSB. Although the St. Marianna score had the best 3-risk-group model performance, both the Okayama and St. Marianna scores achieved 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value in the 2-risk-group classification. The Kameda score rarely stratified patients as high risk, resulting in limited predictive performance. In settings where missed diagnoses are considered more harmful than unnecessary biopsies, the 2-risk-group classification and the 3-risk-group model of each score performed similarly.
The St. Marianna score or Okayama scores may help reducing unnecessary biopsies without missing IVLBCL diagnoses in settings similar to our cohort. These results should be validated locally before routine clinical use.

PMID:
42674924
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement