Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Beyond "Picky Eating": Identification, Screening, and Referral for Pediatric Feeding Disorders in Primary Care.

Created on 01 Sep 2026

Authors

Asma A Taha, Sarah F Sahl, Julia R Farrell, Amber Wright, Kelsey Frazier, Sylvia Doan

Published in

Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners. Volume 40. Issue 5. Pages 770-781.

Abstract

Pediatric feeding disorders (PFDs) affect 1 in 37 children under age 5 in the United States, representing a common yet frequently underrecognized condition in primary care. In 2019, a multidisciplinary expert panel established the first consensus definition of PFD, creating a standardized four-domain framework (medical, nutritional, feeding skill, and psychosocial) that has transformed clinical assessment and management. A recent 2025 consensus further clarified the relationship between PFD and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), providing guidance on diagnostic overlap and differentiation. This continuing education article provides pediatric healthcare providers with current, evidence-based knowledge to screen, identify, and make appropriate referrals for children with PFDs. The article reviews the consensus definitions, epidemiology, validated screening tools, differential diagnosis, risk factors, assessment strategies, and referral guidelines. A case-based example illustrates the application of the four-domain framework in clinical practice. With appropriate early identification and intervention, most children with feeding difficulties can achieve improved nutritional status, oral-motor development, and positive mealtime experiences.

PMID:
42674753
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement