Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Vector-Controlled *CO Transport Drives Efficient Urea Electrosynthesis.

Created on 01 Sep 2026

Authors

Qingshuo Li, Yahui Li, Xiaolong Yue, Jinli Fan, Biyu Kang, Ying Wang

Published in

Environmental science & technology. Volume 60. Issue 33. Pages 23535-23545. Aug 25, 2026.

Abstract

Electrocatalytic coupling of carbon dioxide and nitrate provides a sustainable route for urea synthesis. However, constrained by the ambiguous intermediate reaction pathways, such systems typically require a highly negative potential (≤ -0.5 V vs RHE) to achieve high urea yields. This inevitably results in prohibitive electricity expenses, which account for approximately 48% of the total expenditure for urea electrosynthesis and represent a major bottleneck hindering this promising approach. Herein, a vector-controlled *CO intermediate transport strategy is reported to direct the coupling pathway. This strategy realized an anodic potential shift of 300 mV and a remarkable urea yield of 2927 μg h-1 cm-2 at -0.2 V (vs RHE), outperforming most reported electrocatalysts. Techno-economic analysis reveals that this process reduces energy consumption and cuts electricity costs by over 25%. This unidirectional *CO transport is achieved via a precisely engineered CuAg interface, where a tailored asymmetric local electronic environment with a d-band center difference of 1.64 eV induces a *CO adsorption energy difference of 0.8 eV. This enables continuous *CO desorption from weakly adsorbing Ag sites and unidirectional transport to strongly adsorbing Cu sites, thus facilitating the critical *NOCO formation. This work establishes a promising pathway for energy-saving urea synthesis.

PMID:
42674647
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement