Nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors for traumatic brain injury biomarker detection: a review of analytical performance, machine learning integration, clinical validation, and point-of-care translation.

Authors

Jacob Wekalao, Tobias Topisia

Published in

Frontiers in neurology. Volume 17. Pages 1876862. Epub Aug 17, 2026.

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects an estimated 69 million people each year and remains difficult to diagnose rapidly because conventional assessment relies heavily on neurological examination and computed tomography, which may miss subtle injuries or be unavailable in many clinical settings. Blood-based biomarkers, including S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and neurofilament light chain (NfL), provide measurable indicators of glial, neuronal, and axonal injury across different stages of TBI. Nanomaterial-based biosensors have emerged as promising platforms for detecting these biomarkers with high sensitivity, rapid response, and potential for point-of-care testing. This review evaluates recent advances in electrochemical, optical, and emerging biosensor technologies for TBI biomarker detection, with emphasis on analytical performance, clinical validation, and translational potential. The review examines the contributions of gold nanoparticles, graphene derivatives, carbon nanotubes, MXenes, and related nanomaterials to improving signal transduction, surface functionalization, and detection sensitivity in immunosensors and aptasensors. Key analytical parameters, including limit of detection, linear dynamic range, assay time, and selectivity, are assessed against clinically relevant thresholds such as the FDA-cleared GFAP cutoff of 22 pg./mL and the UCH-L1 cutoff of 327 pg./mL. Progress in multiplex biosensing, artificial intelligence-assisted data analysis, and portable diagnostic platforms is also discussed. Although many nanomaterial-enabled biosensors achieve analytical performance well below clinical detection thresholds, most have been validated only in buffer solutions or spiked biological samples, with limited evaluation in patient cohorts. Future progress will depend on robust clinical validation, standardized performance assessment, scalable manufacturing, and regulatory alignment to support the translation of TBI biosensors into routine point-of-care practice.

PMID:
42676354
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.