An Appraisal of the Potential Downstream Benefits of RSV Vaccination in Older Adults.

Authors

Piotr Rzymski

Published in

Reviews in medical virology. Volume 36. Issue 5. Pages e70198.

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) has long been underrecognized as a significant pathogen in older adults, despite accumulating evidence of its substantial morbidity and mortality burden in this population. While RSV vaccination is now well established as an effective intervention for preventing lower respiratory tract disease, this narrative review examines whether its public health value may extend beyond these primary clinical endpoints. A targeted search of Scopus and Web of Science from database inception to May 2026 was conducted to identify biological, epidemiological, observational, interventional, and modelling evidence relevant to potential downstream vaccine effects. The available evidence potentially supports hypotheses concerning possible reductions in cardiovascular complications and secondary bacterial infections, possible decreases in transmission to younger household contacts, and potential preservation of functional status and independence. However, the strength of evidence varies substantially across these outcomes. Cardiovascular protection has not been independently demonstrated in randomized trials, bacterial and antimicrobial-use outcomes have rarely been prespecified, real-world household transmission studies are unavailable, and functional trajectories may be strongly modified by baseline frailty and pre-existing disability. RSV vaccination in older adults therefore remains a well-validated strategy for preventing acute respiratory disease, whereas its proposed broader effects should be regarded as biologically plausible but incompletely demonstrated benefits. Future studies should incorporate prespecified cardiovascular, bacterial, transmission, geriatric, and functional outcomes, with particular attention to frailty, antimicrobial use, and longer-term follow-up.

PMID:
42678150
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.