Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Resolving finite-size errors in EOM-CCSD band gaps of solids with interacting-bath dynamical embedding theory.

Created on 01 Sep 2026

Authors

Jiachen Li, Christopher Hillenbrand, Christian Venturella, Enzhi Chen, Tianyu Zhu

Published in

The Journal of chemical physics. Volume 165. Issue 9. Sep 07, 2026.

Abstract

Periodic equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory with single and double excitations (EOM-CCSD) has shown promise for quantitative calculations of band structures in solids. However, its steep computational scaling has limited calculations to relatively coarse k-point meshes, leading to sizable finite-size errors and discrepant estimates of thermodynamic-limit band gaps in recent benchmarks. In this work, we revisit EOM-CCSD band gaps for ten semiconductors and insulators using interacting-bath dynamical embedding theory (ibDET), a systematically improvable Green's function embedding framework that enables dense Brillouin-zone sampling at modest computational cost. By pushing the k-point sampling up to 10 × 10 × 10, well beyond the system sizes accessible in canonical periodic EOM-CCSD calculations, we significantly reduce finite-size errors and obtain stable thermodynamic-limit extrapolations. We further compare G0W0@PBE, G0W0@HF, and EOM-CCSD on an equal footing using the same numerical settings in PySCF. We find that EOM-CCSD yields a mean absolute error of 0.32 eV relative to experimental band gaps for a test set of ten semiconductors and insulators, which is lower than that of G0W0@PBE. For ZnO, EOM-CCSD also accurately describes the Zn 3d-band binding energy, despite overestimating the band gap. These results demonstrate that ibDET offers a practical route to high-accuracy many-body electronic structure calculations in periodic systems.

PMID:
42678203
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement