Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Practice composition and sub-specialization among fellowship-trained HPB surgeons: impact on outcomes following hepatopancreatic surgery.

Created on 02 Sep 2026

Authors

Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou, Timothy M Pawlik

Published in

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. Aug 20, 2026. Epub Aug 20, 2026.

Abstract

The impact of sub-specialization and practice composition among surgeons performing hepatopancreatic (HP) surgery in the United States has not been previously characterized.
Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HP surgery (2016-2021) were identified. HP practice composition, defined as the proportion of HP procedures among all surgeries performed by each surgeon during the study period was assessed. The primary outcome was achievement of textbook outcome (TO) after HP surgery relative to HP practice composition.
A total of 20,614 HP procedures were performed by 710 fellowship-trained surgeons (CGSO:n = 578, 81.4%, AHPBA:n = 111, 15.6%, both n = 21, 3.0%). Most surgeons were low-volume for both hepatic and pancreatic surgery (H-low/P-low:41.1%). CGSO and AHPBA fellowship graduates had comparable liver and pancreas volume practices (p = 0.24). Median HP practice composition among all surgeons was 20.7% (IQR:10.1-35.7%). Higher HP-specific volume and higher HP practice composition were independently associated with a greater probability of TO after hepatectomy and pancreatectomy (both p < 0.05). Among CGSO graduates, HP practice composition varied significantly by graduating CGSO program.
HP case composition varied markedly relative to fellowship training. Despite greater HP case composition being associated with improved outcomes, most fellowship-trained HP surgeons maintained broad-based and low volume HP practices.

PMID:
42680617
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement