Failure to rescue after oesophagectomy. The importance of recording complications. A 20-year retrospective study.

Authors

Silvia Carbonell-Morote, Miriam Menéndez-Jiménez, Marcos Bruna Esteban, Roberto Adriano Castro, Fabián Velázquez-Rebosa, Inmaculada Mesa Ruiz, Javier Vaqué, Fernando Mingol-Navarro

Published in

Cirugia espanola. Pages 800376. Sep 01, 2026. Epub Sep 01, 2026.

Abstract

Oesophageal cancer is a rare type of neoplasm in Western countries, yet it ranks as the seventh leading cause of death. Due to its anatomical location, oesophageal surgery is a highly complex procedure. The morbidity and mortality associated with oesophagectomy are significant, highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary approach to minimise complications. The measure of failure to rescue (FTR) reflects surgical outcomes and indicates the capacity to prevent death after a major complication (MC). It serves as a valuable metric for comparing results among different medical centers.
To evaluate the failure to rescue rate following esophagectomy at a high-volume tertiary oesophageal surgery center.
This retrospective study analysed FTR, mortality, and morbidity rates following oesophageal surgery from 2003 to 2024. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were assessed across patient groups. Comorbidities were evaluated using the ASA score, and complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
268 patients underwent oesophagectomy during the period of study. 129 (48%) experienced MC. Among these, 25 patients died within the first 90 days after surgery: FTR rate of 19.3%. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified respiratory complications, including pneumonia and adult respiratory distress syndrome, as independent factors associated with FTR.
Respiratory complications are identified as the most significant risk factor for FTR following oesophagectomy.

PMID:
42680095
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.