Quantitative classification of asbestos-like morphology for assessing potentially hazardous fibrous minerals.

Authors

Jasmine R Petriglieri, Luca Barale, Maura Tomatis, Alessandro Cavallo, Chiara De Giuli, Maria Rosaria Bruno, Angelo Olori, Biagio Maria Bruni, Paolo Ballirano, Elena Belluso, Fabrizio Piana, Alessandro Pacella, Antonella Campopiano, Francesco Turci

Published in

Journal of hazardous materials. Volume 516. Pages 143415. Aug 27, 2026. Epub Aug 27, 2026.

Abstract

Hazard assessment of naturally occurring asbestos and asbestos-like minerals (NOA) is hindered by the lack of standardized criteria for quantifying asbestos-like morphology. This work introduces the fibrosity parameter (F_p), an experimental approach for classifying suspected fibrous minerals. F_p combines standardized mechanical stress with automated morphometric analysis to evaluate changes in the percentage of elongate mineral particles (EMP) during milling. The approach was tested on five antigorite and three tremolite samples spanning fibrous, lamellar, and prismatic morphologies, using crocidolite, amosite, MMVF, and talc as references. F_p is defined by EMP% after 20 min of milling (EMP₂₀%) and the slope of EMP% between 2 and 20 min (S). Thresholds of EMP₂₀% = 50% and S = -1 distinguished four morphological scenarios: 1) asbestos or asbestos-like, 2) precautionary asbestos-like, 3) non-asbestos-like, and 4) non-asbestos. Fibrous antigorite samples and one tremolite retained high EMP contents and behaved comparably to asbestos references, whereas another macroscopically fibrous tremolite progressively lost fibrosity and was classified as non asbestos-like. Thus, macroscopic fibrosity is not a reliable proxy for asbestos-like fragmentation behaviour. F_p provides a quantitative and reproducible morphological screening tool that complements broader hazard assessment. However, F_p is not a stand-alone predictor of pathogenicity.

PMID:
42679572
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.