Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: from margin demarcation to complete resection.

Created on 02 Sep 2026

Authors

Satoru Mizutani, Seiichiro Abe, Yutaka Saito

Published in

Clinical endoscopy. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains a major global health burden, particularly in Asia, where widespread implementation of endoscopic screening has increased the detection of early gastric cancer (EGC). With advances in endoscopic techniques, endoscopic resection (ER), especially endoscopic submucosal dissection, has become the standard treatment for EGC with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Undifferentiated-type EGC (UD-EGC) is associated with a higher risk of LNM than differentiated-type EGC. However, favorable long-term outcomes can be achieved with curative resection. Despite this, accurate endoscopic detection, characterization, and delineation of UD-EGC remain a challenge because of their subtle morphology and unique growth pattern. Image-enhanced endoscopy, particularly magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging, plays an important role in diagnosis and assessment of the lateral extent of the lesion. In Japan, accumulating evidence, including prospective multicenter trials, has led to the classification of intramucosal UD-EGC ≤2 cm without ulceration, as an absolute indication for ER in the latest clinical guidelines. Short and long-term outcomes after curative ER for UD-EGC are comparable to those after surgical resection. This review summarizes the current literature on the diagnosis and endoscopic management of UD-EGC, providing a comparative overview of differences in endoscopic treatment recommendations among international guidelines.

PMID:
42681906
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement