Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Functionally active lymphoid aggregates correlate with improved prognosis in brain metastases.

Created on 02 Sep 2026

Authors

Noor E Nader, Alexandra R Glathar, Elaine V Byrnes, Marion Joy, Tengziyi Ge, Andrew Elliott, Ryan Jaehne, Caroline J Layding, Curtis Mamoru Tatsuoka, Gabriel Sica, Rajesh Acharya, Riyue Bao, Anthony R Cillo, Aron Y Joon, Swaminathan Kumar, Rami B Yanes, Xiancheng Wu, Luisa M Solis Soto, Claudio A Arrechedera, Auriole Tamegnon, Beatriz Sanchez-Espiridion, Hussein A Tawbi, Elizabeth M Burton, Michael A Davies, Thomas M Pearce, Timothy F Burns, Laura P Stabile, Xiaoran Zhang, Tullia C Bruno

Published in

Cancer discovery. Sep 02, 2026. Epub Sep 02, 2026.

Abstract

B cells and their cellular neighborhoods, i.e., lymphoid aggregates (LAs) and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), have not been extensively studied in melanoma brain metastases (BM) or lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) BM, despite their prognostic value and role in immunotherapeutic responses. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic benefit and heterogeneity of B cell infiltration and LA formation in more than 200 patients with melanoma-BM or LUAD-BM. We found that LAs were associated with increased intratumoral CD8+T cells in melanoma-BM compared with LUAD-BM. Moreover, the presence of LAs was associated with an increased survival benefit in patients with melanoma-BM but not in those with LUAD-BM. Despite lacking canonical TLS hallmarks, LAs in BM contained proliferating B and T cells with the potential for effector function. Our work has solidified the need for the mechanistic investigation of intracranial B cells and the immune neighborhoods in which they reside.

PMID:
42684018
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement