Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Effect of intrinsic sphincter deficiency on treatment success following urethral bulking with polyacrylamide hydrogel.

Created on 02 Sep 2026

Authors

Bertie Geng, Layla Joudeh, Ayanna Garland, Elizabeth J Geller

Published in

Investigative and clinical urology. Volume 67. Issue 5. Pages 488-495.

Abstract

Intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) is associated with lower stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment success. Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PH) is a widely used urethral bulking material in treating SUI. Our goal is to compare treatment outcomes in women with and without ISD who underwent urethral bulking with PH for SUI.
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of women who underwent urethral bulking with PH from October 2022 to November 2024. Exclusions included no SUI on preoperative urodynamics, prior surgical SUI treatment, or no follow-up visit. ISD was defined as cough or Valsalva leak point pressure ≤60 cm H₂O or maximal urethral closure pressure ≤20 cm H₂O on preoperative urodynamics. Treatment success was defined as no SUI or improved SUI at initial follow-up.
Of the 171 participants included, 21 (12.3%) met criteria for ISD. Those with ISD were older and received a greater amount of PH compared to those without ISD (1.79 mL vs. 1.65 mL, p=0.05). There were no differences in self-reported race/ethnicity, body mass index, parity, or rates of concomitant prolapse repair. There were no differences in uroflow or micturition pattern or bladder sensation on preoperative urodynamics. Treatment success was high in both (95.2% with ISD vs. 89.9% without ISD, p=0.70). Rates of SUI retreatment were low in both and did not differ.
While there were some differences between those with and without ISD, both had high treatment success rates. Using PH bulking injection to treat SUI in those with ISD is reasonable.

PMID:
42683861
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement