Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Changes in documentation of social risk factor diagnosis codes: comparison of Medicaid Accountable Care Organization model types.

Created on 03 Sep 2026

Authors

Kevin H Nguyen, Kenneth Lim, Kathryn Thompson, Sarah H Gordon, Collette N Ncube, Lois McCloskey, Megan B Cole

Published in

Health affairs scholar. Volume 4. Issue 9. Pages qxag220. Epub Aug 25, 2026.

Abstract

Identifying social risk factors during the perinatal period may improve pregnancy-related outcomes. In 2018, the Massachusetts Medicaid program implemented an accountable care organization (ACO)-which required social risk factor screening-under 2 ACO model types: Model A (health system/Medicaid managed care plan partnership model) and Model B (primary care practice model).
Using the 2016-2020 Massachusetts All Payer Claims Database and a difference-in-differences (DiD) design, we compared changes in any social risk factor documentation (ie, ICD-10 Z-codes) for Medicaid-enrolled deliveries in non-ACOs vs ACO Model A vs Model B, measured separately for the prenatal period, 60 days postpartum, 12 months postpartum, and the perinatal period. Secondary outcomes included documentation of specific Z-codes related to homelessness and food insecurity.
Both Model A (DiD = 1.03 percentage points [PP], P < .001) and Model B (DiD = 0.65 PP, P < .001) were associated with significant increases in Z-code documentation of food insecurity in the perinatal period. Model B was associated with a significant increase in Z-code documentation of homelessness in the perinatal period (DiD = 1.10 PP, P < .001) but not Model A.
Massachusetts' Medicaid ACO was associated with modest increases in Z-code documentation during the perinatal period, with some variation by ACO model type.

PMID:
42688422
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement