Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Self-reported and Point-of-Care Biomarkers of Substance Use Measures Among Older Adults with HIV from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Created on 04 Sep 2026

Authors

Kathryn E Lancaster, Melissa A Stockton, Judith A Hahn, Thida Chanyachukul, Ivan Marbaniang, Dhanushi Rupasinghe, Hai Thi Thanh Nguyen, Edith Kwobah, Helen Byakwaga, Aggrey Semeere, Suzanne Goodrich, Patrizia Carrieri, Gad Murenzi, Hugo Perazzo, Brenda Crabtree Ramírez, Jessica Mejía, Andreas D Haas, Ardele Mandiriri, Albert Minga, Marie Plaisy, Antoine Jaquet, Angela M Parcesepe, Sentinel Research Network of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS

Published in

AIDS and behavior. Sep 03, 2026. Epub Sep 03, 2026.

Abstract

Measuring alcohol and other drug (AOD) use remains challenging in HIV care in low- and middle-income countries, where self-report and point-of-care (POC) urine biomarkers capture different time windows. Among 2,059 people with HIV aged 40 years or older across eight IeDEA clinics (2020 to 2022), we examined what self-reported AOD use (AUDIT, ASSIST) and POC urine tests (uEtG for alcohol; 5-panel drug screen) each capture. Self-report identified more use than urine testing (unhealthy alcohol 19.7% versus uEtG-positive 12.2%), consistent with its longer recall window. Higher self-reported alcohol intensity was associated with uEtG positivity in a graded pattern, more strongly among women. Urine-positive but self-report-negative results, more common among men, suggested under-reporting. Self-report and biomarkers answer different measurement questions: self-report for longer-term burden and screening, biomarkers for recent use and corroboration. Combining both, including longer-window biomarkers, can strengthen AOD measurement among older PWH in LMICs.

PMID:
42690579
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement