Architectural Optimization of Multilayer Thermal Barrier Coatings.

Authors

Afshin Ashofteh, Sana Seifollahpour

Published in

ACS applied materials & interfaces. Sep 03, 2026. Epub Sep 03, 2026.

Abstract

Multilayer thermal barrier coatings provide greater flexibility for tailoring coating performance, but the large number of possible material combinations and layer configurations makes architectural optimization increasingly difficult through experimental trial and error alone. In this study, an experimentally generated dataset spanning single-layer, bilayer, multilayer, graded, variable-thickness, and physically mixed coating architectures containing conventional yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ), nanostructured YSZ, and ceria yttria stabilized zirconia (CYSZ) was analyzed using machine learning to investigate the relationship between coating architecture and degradation-related performance. Surrogate models were developed for multiple degradation responses and combined with model interpretation, consistency assessment, and multiobjective optimization to examine the influence of composition, layer arrangement, and thickness distribution on coating behavior. The analysis showed that different degradation metrics provide distinct perspectives on coating performance and should not be treated equally during optimization. It also identified the architectural variables with the greatest influence on degradation resistance and durability, allowing practical architecture level design trends to be identified from the experimental data. Global performance-relative-cost screening of the investigated 450 μm architectures selected a YSZ/nanostructured YSZ bilayer as a practical candidate for balancing performance and cost while reducing final degradation and preserving high cyclic durability, making it technically viable for further development and engineering applications.

PMID:
42691109
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.