Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

miR-1289 promotes glioblastoma tumorigenesis via targeting EFNA5.

Created on 04 Sep 2026

Authors

Yunyun Li, Lu Wang

Published in

Brain research. Pages 150526. Sep 03, 2026. Epub Sep 03, 2026.

Abstract

miR-1289 is dysregulated in various cancers, but its mechanism in glioblastoma (GBM) remains unclear.
This study sought to examine the association between miR-1289 expression and GBM patients' clinical prognosis, and its effect on GBM cell biological behaviors.
qRT-PCR was used to measure miR-1289 and EFNA5 expression. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was used to assess the association of miR-1289 expression and patient survival probability, and a multivariate Cox regression model was utilized to assess its prognostic value. CCK-8 and Transwell assays were utilized to detect GBM cell migration, invasion, and proliferation. Potential target genes of miR-1289 were computationally predicted via an integrated approach using the miRDB database. The direct binding between miR-1289 and EFNA5 was experimentally validated via dual-luciferase reporter assays.
miR-1289 was highly expressed in GBM. High miR-1289 expression in GBM correlated with notably shorter survival, and it served as a GBM prognostic marker. Downregulation of miR-1289 significantly inhibited GBM cells' malignant behaviors. Mechanistically, miR-1289 could directly target and regulate EFNA5, and their expressions were negatively correlated in GBM. Knockdown of EFNA5 reversed the tumor-suppressive effect induced by miR-1289 downregulation.
miR-1289 has the potential to be a prognostic biomarker for GBM and promotes the malignant biological behaviors of GBM cells by targeting EFNA5.

PMID:
42692382
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement