Impact of E-Cigarette Exposure on Wound Healing After Surgical Vocal Fold Injury in Mice.

Authors

Akari Kimura, Meena Easwaran, Patrick Timothy Kiessling, Amirbahador Golchin, Elizabeth Erickson-DiRenzo

Published in

The Laryngoscope. Sep 03, 2026. Epub Sep 03, 2026.

Abstract

Surgical manipulation of the vocal folds carries a risk of mucosal injury. We used an established unilateral mouse vocal fold injury model to determine whether electronic cigarette (E-cig) exposure after injury induces remodeling and inflammatory responses in the vocal fold mucosa that differ from injury alone.
Adult mice underwent unilateral vocal fold injury using a wire brush under microscopy and were assigned to an Injury or Injury + E-cig group. The Injury + E-cig group received daily E-cig aerosol exposure after injury. Mice were sacrificed at 3, 14, and 28 days. A room air-exposed group served as Control. We quantified epithelial (EP) thickness and lamina propria (LP) area, measured expression of genes related to EP junctions, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and inflammation, and performed immunostaining to corroborate gene expression findings.
Injury + E-cig mice exhibited blunted post-injury weight gain versus Controls. EP thickness and EP junction gene expression recovered similarly in Injury and Injury + E-cig groups. In contrast, early LP expansion and acute increases in TNF-α, F4/80, and Col3α1 were attenuated with E-cig exposure, indicating selective disruption of acute macrophage-associated inflammatory and ECM responses.
This is the first study to examine the effects of E-cig exposure on vocal fold wound healing. Clinically, these findings raise concern about postoperative E-cig use after vocal fold surgery. Although often viewed as safer than smoking, E-cig use may alter early wound healing responses that are essential for restoring vocal fold structure and function.
N/A.

PMID:
42692857
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.