Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A National Assessment of Cancer Center Shared Resources Metrics: Results from the First NACCSR Survey.

Created on 04 Sep 2026

Authors

Jerry Edward Chipuk, Fei Ye, Jai N Patel, Steven J Madore, Crystal F Kline, Matthew Nowacki, Andrés Chousal Cantú, David S Goerlitz, Kevin K C Lloyd, Jay W Fox, George S Grills

Published in

Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT. Volume 37. Issue 3. Pages 7-17. Epub Sep 01, 2026.

Abstract

Tracking core metrics is a critical component of centralized core facility management and is essential for ensuring that individual cores are efficiently operated, effectively evaluated, and optimally catalyze research. The National Alliance of Cancer Center Shared Resources (NACCSR) is a consortium of shared resource leaders from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated Cancer Centers. The NACCSR Core Metrics Committee (CMC) includes shared resource leaders from a dozen NCI-designated cancer centers. Presented here are the results of a recent CMC survey aimed at identifying core metrics critical to cancer center shared resources, including operations, usage, financials, and scientific impact. The end goals of this survey are to benchmark cancer center core metrics and to provide a base for recommendations on best practices for optimizing the tracking, evaluation, and presentation of core metrics. Moreover, these survey findings will inform evidence-based recommendations to the NCI on the essential core metrics to be incorporated into both the individual shared resource sections and the centralized shared resource management components of NCI P30 Cancer Center Support Grants.

PMID:
42694855
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement