Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Living kidney donation in Brazil, 2010-2023: a descriptive time-series analysis.

Created on 05 Sep 2026

Authors

Márcia Bastos Convento, Fernanda Teixeira Borges

Published in

Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. Volume 48. Issue 4. Pages e20260051.

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease imposes a high clinical and economic burden on the Brazilian Unified Health System, and kidney transplantation represents one of the best therapeutic choices for selected patients.
To describe trends in living-donor (LD) kidney transplantation in Brazil (2010-2023), analyzing the donor-recipient relationship and the operational stock-to-annual production ratio on the waiting list, as well as to compare hospital indicators and estimated patient and graft survival between LD and deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplants.
This descriptive time-series study used aggregated, publicly available data.
The waiting list increased by 15% (from 33,253 to 38,258), and the total number of transplants rose by 29% (from 4,656 to 6,047). Data showed an increase in deceased-donor transplants (from 3,001 to 5,189) and a decrease in LD transplants (from 1,655 to 858), with the LD share declining from 35.55% to 14.19% and the per-million-population rate falling from 8.8 to 4.2. Among LD, there was a relative decrease in related donors (from 82.80% to 71.21%), a relative increase in unrelated spouse donors (from 10.57% to 18.65%), and a relative increase in other unrelated donors (from 6.64% to 10.14%). In descriptive comparisons, LD transplantation showed higher published patient and graft survival estimates and more favorable hospital indicators, including lower in-hospital mortality, shorter length of stay, and lower mean hospital admission authorization values.
The findings suggest the relevance of integrated strategies to sustain deceased-donor procurement and strengthen living-donor kidney transplantation. However, comparisons between donor types were descriptive and should not be interpreted as causal.

PMID:
42696731
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement