Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

External Validation of an Injury Risk Prediction Algorithm in US Army Paratroopers.

Created on 05 Sep 2026

Authors

Christopher W Boyer, Garrett S Bullock, Daniel I Rhon

Published in

Medicine and science in sports and exercise. Sep 04, 2026. Epub Sep 04, 2026.

Abstract

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) pose a major threat to military readiness, affecting nearly 40% of personnel annually, driving over 5 million medical visits and 24 million limited duty days. Validated methods for identifying and preventing injuries are a priority for the Department of Defense.
To externally validate a previously developed prediction model for identifying MSKI risk in a U.S. Army airborne infantry brigade.
Prospective cohort; model validation study.
U.S. Army paratroopers newly assigned to the 173rd Airborne Brigade (Nov 2022-Aug 2023) underwent baseline screening with a published risk prediction algorithm. The primary outcome was a duty-limiting MSKI within one year, identified through the Army's e-Profile database from the Medical Operations Data System. Model performance was assessed for discrimination, calibration, calibration-in-the-large, overall fit, and decision curve analysis, with internal validation using 2,000 bootstrap interactions. Performance was compared with the original model.
308 paratroopers were prospectively followed for one year (93,636 military exposure days), during which 30.7% sustained a duty-limiting musculoskeletal injury. The model demonstrated poor discrimination (AUC 0.59, 95% CI 0.52-0.66) and only marginal net benefit over a treat-all strategy.
The model failed to discriminate injury risk (AUC 0.59) and did not provide reliable calibration or meaningful net benefit. This model does not justify implementation for injury risk screening in this specific setting.

PMID:
42696677
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement