Evolutionary Brain-Body Co-Optimization Consistently Fails to Select for Morphological Potential.

Authors

Alican Mertan, Nick Cheney

Published in

Artificial life. Pages 1-20. Sep 04, 2026. Epub Sep 04, 2026.

Abstract

Brain-body co-optimization remains a challenging problem. To understand and overcome its challenges, we exhaustively map a morphology-fitness landscape: we train controllers for each morphology in a design space of 1,305,840 voxel-based soft robots. We show that this design space constitutes a good model for studying brain-body co-optimization and that our mapping roughly captures its landscape. Complete knowledge of the landscape lets us analyze how evolutionary co-optimization algorithms unfold. We find that the tested algorithms cannot consistently find near-optimal solutions: the search, at times, gets stuck on morphologies one mutation away from better ones, because it regularly undervalues individuals with newly mutated bodies and eliminates promising morphologies. On the other hand, co-optimizing morphology and control creates useful goal-switching, yielding morphology-controller pairs whose performance cannot be reached by optimizing the controller alone for a fixed morphology. Together, these results ground trends in the literature and offer insights for future work.

PMID:
42696511
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.