Mechanosensitive channels dominate the minimal ion channel repertoire in prokaryotes.

Authors

Cristóbal Uribe, Luciano Peña, Samuel Morales-Navarro, Sebastián E Brauchi, Gonzalo Riadi, Juan C Opazo, Wendy González

Published in

Biophysical journal. Sep 04, 2026. Epub Sep 04, 2026.

Abstract

The eukaryotic genomes encode hundreds of proteins that function as ion channels and transporters. Essential for sustaining life, these proteins mediate the movement of inorganic ions (e.g., K⁺, Na⁺, Cl^-, and Ca²⁺) across the plasma membrane according to their electrochemical gradients. In multicellular organisms, a diverse array of ion channels contributes to the maintenance of the resting membrane potential, the regulation of pH, osmolarity, and cell volume, and the control of secretion, electrical excitability, and synaptic activity, among many other fundamental physiological processes. Although independent evolutionary origins have been proposed for several ion channel families, their relative hierarchical importance for cellular viability remains poorly understood. To advance our knowledge of ion channel evolutionary history, we focused on determining the minimal combination of permeabilities that allows cellular viability. To this end, we conducted a survey of representative prokaryotes with small genomes across bacterial and archaeal phyla. By focusing on the smallest genomes, our approach enabled the identification of five ion channel architectures shared among prokaryotes. Among these, non-selective mechanosensitive channels (MscS and MscL) are the most abundant, followed by potassium channels, CLC-type channels and proton channels of the MotA/TolQ/ExbB family. The conservation of the mechanosensitive protein architecture across archaeal and bacterial membranes suggests that the capacity to monitor physical membrane integrity predates the requirements for electrical communication.

PMID:
42698212
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.