Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

An Open-Quantum-Systems Theory of Quantum-Biological Communication Channels.

Created on 06 Sep 2026

Authors

Liang Dong

Published in

IEEE transactions on molecular, biological, and multi-scale communications. Volume 12. Pages 858-874. Epub Jul 23, 2026.

Abstract

Quantum biology and communication engineering remain only partly integrated. One is organized around mechanisms, the other around input-output channels. This paper joins them. We model a quantum-biological communication channel (QBCC) as an open quantum system: an input is encoded into a biological quantum subsystem, the state evolves under Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad dynamics in a structured bath, and a classical readout induces a channel law W T ( y x ) . When is such a system a channel at all, rather than an observed quantum process? An operational criterion answers this, built on an arbitrary-but-fixed encoding and a commuting abstraction-representation diagram. The channel law then connects to mutual information, capacity, quantum Fisher information, and a noise-assistance index. Four reusable primitives follow: radical-pair receivers, exciton routers, proton-tunnelling genetic error channels, and ion-coherence links. One illustrative network and four literature-informed case studies instantiate them. A penalized likelihood-ratio test is then applied to two of them. It separates a phase-sensitive interference channel, not reproduced by the sign-blind rate null, from the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex, whose noise-assisted transport that null already reproduces. A falsifiability workflow, two worked applications, and a five-layer network stack complete the framework.

PMID:
42699610
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement