Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Pontine Infarction Presenting With Right Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia in a Patient With Patent Foramen Ovale and May-Thurner Syndrome: A Case Report.

Created on 06 Sep 2026

Authors

Khoa Pham, Pho Doan, Long Nguyen, Paul Parvesh, Max Rash

Published in

Cureus. Volume 18. Issue 9. Pages e115744. Epub Sep 03, 2026.

Abstract

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common congenital cardiac anomaly associated with cryptogenic ischemic stroke in adults. The likelihood of PFO-associated stroke is increased in the presence of high-risk anatomical features such as substantial right-to-left shunting or an associated atrial septal aneurysm (ASA). Brainstem ischemic events associated with PFO, however, are less frequently reported. We present the case of a 59-year-old man who developed dizziness, binocular diplopia, right internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO), and gait instability. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an old pontine infarct without evidence of recent or acute infarction; however, based on the acute clinical presentation and neurologic examination, neurology considered the presentation clinically consistent with a subacute pontine ischemic infarct. Subsequent cardiac evaluation demonstrated a PFO with right-to-left shunting and an associated ASA, and the patient later underwent successful percutaneous PFO closure. The coexistence of May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) provided a potential venous thrombotic substrate for paradoxical embolism, although no active venous thrombus was documented. This case highlights an uncommon brainstem presentation in a patient with high-risk PFO anatomy and emphasizes the importance of distinguishing a plausible paradoxical embolic mechanism from proven causation.

PMID:
42701711
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement