Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

MRD-guided induction-intensification with daratumumab-carfilzomib-based regimen followed by ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Created on 07 Sep 2026

Authors

Daizo Yokoyama, Daisuke Minakata, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Seina Honda, Ryutaro Tominaga, Atsuto Noguchi, Shuka Furuki, Shunsuke Koyama, Rui Murahashi, Hirotomo Nakashima, Kazuki Hyodo, Shin-Ichiro Kawaguchi, Yumiko Toda, Kento Umino, Masuzu Ueda, Masahiro Ashizawa, Chihiro Yamamoto, Kaoru Hatano, Kazuya Sato, Ken Ohmine, Yoshinobu Kanda

Published in

Leukemia & lymphoma. Pages 1-13. Sep 06, 2026. Epub Sep 06, 2026.

Abstract

This single-institution retrospective study evaluated a measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided induction intensification strategy in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated in the anti-CD38 antibody era. Sixty patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between 2020 and 2025 were included. Most received bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as initial therapy. Patients with persistent MRD by multiparameter flow cytometry underwent treatment intensification, commonly with daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone before ASCT. Among 52 evaluable patients, 35 (67.3%) achieved MRD negativity before ASCT, and 30 of 32 (93.8%) were MRD-negative after ASCT. Stem cell mobilization and engraftment were successful. After median follow-up of 28.5 months, 2-year progression-free and overall survival were 87.3% and 98.0%. R-ISS stage III and extramedullary disease were associated with inferior progression-free survival. High-risk cytogenetics showed poorer outcomes. This MRD-adapted strategy was feasible, achieved deep responses, and preserved mobilization, but high-risk disease remained prone to relapse, supporting post-transplant intensification.

PMID:
42702057
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement