Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A multi-stage prospective study evaluates serum metabolomic signatures for the differential diagnosis and prognostic stratification of PDAC.

Created on 07 Sep 2026

Authors

Zhouyu Ning, Ying Zhu, Hui Li, Zhiqiang Meng

Published in

Translational oncology. Volume 73. Pages 103025. Sep 06, 2026. Epub Sep 06, 2026.

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) lacks biomarkers for accurate diagnosis and prognostic stratification. The standard, CA19-9, has suboptimal specificity in differentiating PDAC from mimics like chronic pancreatitis (CP). We investigated serum metabolomic signatures to address these challenges.
We conducted a prospective, multi-cohort (n = 221) untargeted metabolomics study, analyzing PDAC (n = 66), healthy control (n = 92), other cancer (n = 40), and CP (n = 23) groups. Machine learning and survival analysis were employed to build diagnostic and prognostic models from serum samples collected at diagnosis.
A two-metabolite panel distinguished PDAC from other cancers (AUC=0.894), and a five-metabolite signature showed high discrimination between PDAC and CP (AUC=0.998; 95% CI, 0.993-1.000). A leakage-resistant nested cross-validation sensitivity analysis yielded a mean AUC of 0.955 (SD, 0.020). The exploratory 18-metabolite risk score separated high- and low-risk groups and remained associated with overall survival after adjustment for stage, age, sex, and CA19-9 (adjusted HR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.05-7.58; P < 0.001), with a C-index of 0.601.
Serum metabolomic profiles identified compact candidate panels that provided information complementary to CA19-9 for PDAC differential diagnosis, while the 18-metabolite risk score was associated with overall survival. These findings support targeted assay development and prospective multicenter evaluation of serum metabolomics for the clinical characterization of PDAC.

PMID:
42702145
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement