Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Guidance (challenges and priorities) in the assessment of children with low vision: ERN-EYE clinical consensus statement.

Created on 07 Sep 2026

Authors

Agnese Suppiej, Chiara Ceccato, Riccardo Maggi, Sandra Valeina, Francesco Parmeggiani, Amelie Gavard, Meindert Jan de Vries, Dominique Brémond-Gignac, Laura Mauring, David J Keegan

Published in

Survey of ophthalmology. Sep 06, 2026. Epub Sep 06, 2026.

Abstract

Across Europe, children living with low vision often face inconsistent approaches to the assessment of their visual function, leading to delays in diagnosis and unequal access to care. To address this gap, a multidisciplinary group of experts from eight European countries developed a clinical consensus statement (CCS), using a modified Delphi process. This CCS provides guidance on evaluation of primary visual functions in children with low vision, regardless of etiologies. Testing visual function can be challenging, and cannot be limited to testing visual acuity. It requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account the child's developmental age and necessary adjustments for vision loss. This consensus presents different validated tools to evaluate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field, and color vision. It provides practical guidance for their use across developmental stages, including infancy and in children with syndromic or neurodevelopmental conditions, and highlights the critical role of caregivers in ensuring reliable assessments. The recommendations emphasize the need for age-appropriate testing strategies, tailored adaptations for low vision and additional impairment, and the importance of early assessment to support timely habilitation and optimize developmental outcomes.

PMID:
42702338
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement