Clinical outcomes of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (VNOTES) in Gynecology: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors

Giorgia Dinoi, Sara Mastrovito, Vincenzo Tarantino, Camilla Riccetti, Davide Arrigo, Giancarlo Paradisi, Antonella Carcagni, Diana Giannarelli, Anna Fagotti, Francesco Fanfani, Giovanni Panico

Published in

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. Sep 06, 2026. Epub Sep 06, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) compared with conventional minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including multiport laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), in benign gynecologic procedures.
A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted from database inception through January 2025. Search terms included "vNOTES" and "laparoscopy." The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025639454). Only English-language studies were included.
Randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies evaluating vNOTES versus MIS in adult women undergoing hysterectomy, adnexal surgery, or myomectomy for benign indications were included. Studies were required to report at least one perioperative outcome. A total of 33 studies involving more than 4,000 patients met inclusion criteria.
Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models were applied. Compared with conventional MIS, vNOTES was associated with significantly shorter operative time (mean difference -25.8 minutes, 95% CI -33.6 to -18.0), lower postoperative pain (mean difference -0.59, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.15), fewer postoperative complications (risk ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.87), and shorter hospital stay (mean difference -0.59 days, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.15). No significant differences were observed in intraoperative complications, conversion rates, or estimated blood loss. Prespecified subgroup analyses and meta-regression found no evidence that surgical procedure type modified these associations.
vNOTES appears to be an effective alternative to conventional MIS for benign gynecologic surgery, offering improved operative efficiency and reduced postoperative morbidity with no statistically significant differences in intraoperative safety. These findings support its integration into minimally invasive gynecologic practice, while further prospective studies are needed to refine indications and patient selection.

PMID:
42702234
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.