Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Audit of the psychiatric extended care model's impact on emergency department length of stay.

Created on 07 Sep 2026

Authors

Adil Ali Mubarak Ali, Pawan Koirala, Cherrie Galletly, Sebastian Alder-Price

Published in

Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Pages 10398562261481761. Sep 06, 2026. Epub Sep 06, 2026.

Abstract

ObjectiveProlonged Emergency Department (ED) Length of Stay (LOS) for mental health patients adversely impacts bed flow. This study evaluated the Psychiatric Extended Care (PEC) model's PEC-C pathway, implemented at Lyell McEwin Hospital in June 2022, which transfers select patients to the Mental Health Short Stay Unit (MHSSU) before psychiatric review.MethodsThis retrospective audit compared ED LOS and Total LOS between "pre-PEC" (January-April 2022) and "post-PEC" (January-April 2024) cohorts meeting PEC-C criteria (voluntary patients meeting predefined safety and medical screening criteria presenting for mental health reasons). Primary outcomes were ED LOS and Total LOS (combined ED plus MHSSU LOS).ResultsIn 2022, 28/686 (4.1%) ED psychiatric referrals met PEC-C criteria; in 2024, 29/679 (4.3%) met criteria. For patients meeting PEC-C criteria, ED LOS decreased from 18.2 hours (IQR: 13.4-22.9) pre-PEC to 9.4 hours (IQR: 6.3-12.5) post-PEC (U = 102.5, p < .001). Total LOS showed no significant difference (69.4 hours [IQR: 7.3-131.5] vs 64.9 hours [IQR: 38.6-91.2], U = 406, p = 1.00). No adverse safety events occurred for patients meeting PEC-C criteria.ConclusionA significant reduction in ED LOS was observed following PEC implementation; Total LOS was unchanged. The quasi-experimental design limits causal inference, warranting prospective evaluation.

PMID:
42702584
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement