Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Rear-end crash risk estimation for freeway work zones using a Bayesian hierarchical random-parameters block maximum approach.

Created on 07 Sep 2026

Authors

Qiang Zeng, Xian Wu, Jing Huang, Jaeyoung Jay Lee, Xiaofei Wang

Published in

Accident; analysis and prevention. Volume 238. Pages 108762. Sep 06, 2026. Epub Sep 06, 2026.

Abstract

Freeway work zones are high-risk locations due to the temporary lane closure. This study aims to estimate rear-end crash risk in these zones based on modeling traffic conflicts. A Bayesian hierarchical random-parameters block maximum (BM) approach, which can accommodate both the multilevel structure and heterogeneity, is proposed to model the extremes of rear-end conflicts. The proposed model is estimated by the traffic conflict data collected from six freeway work zones in Guangdong Province, China. The estimation results indicate that the proportion of oversized vehicles, average speed, and average acceleration have heterogeneous effects on crash risk, whereas traffic volume and the number of open lanes exhibit homogeneous effects. Substantial cross-site heterogeneity is captured by the Bayesian hierarchical framework. Furthermore, model comparison demonstrates that the proposed approach performs better than both the traditional BM approach and the Bayesian hierarchical random-effects BM approach. The findings support the proposed approach as an applicable tool for real-time rear-end crash risk estimation in freeway work zones, which can be readily incorporated into the optimization of proactive safety management strategies, such as variable speed limit and ramp metering.

PMID:
42702194
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement