Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Underdocumentation of laboratory-defined acute kidney injury in internal medicine wards: a retrospective cohort study.

Created on 07 Sep 2026

Authors

Nomy Levin-Iaina, Sharif Zalum, Mustafa Seh, Elena Rotshild, Rey Biton

Published in

Renal failure. Volume 48. Issue 1. Pages 2723684. Epub Sep 06, 2026.

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among hospitalized patients, but laboratory-defined AKI may not be documented. We aimed to determine the frequency of undocumented AKI in internal medicine wards, compare clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes by documentation status, and explore associated factors. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of adult hospitalizations with AKI defined by serum creatinine criteria; urine-output criteria were unavailable. Because reliable pre-admission creatinine values were not consistently available, the lower of admission and discharge creatinine was used as reference and compared with maximal creatinine. Among 161 hospitalizations in 161 unique patients, 39 (24.2%) were undocumented. Undocumented cases had lower admission creatinine (2.1 vs 2.9 mg/dL; p < 0.001), lower maximal creatinine (2.2 vs 3.3 mg/dL; p < 0.001), and more frequent malignancy (23.1% vs 7.4%; p = 0.016). Length of stay and in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly. In 149 hospitalizations with a demonstrable creatinine change, 33 (22.1%) were undocumented. Higher maximal creatinine remained associated with lower odds of underdocumentation (adjusted OR 0.67 per 1 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.50-0.89; p = 0.006). Approximately one quarter of serum creatinine-defined AKI cases were undocumented, particularly those with lower maximal creatinine. Prospective studies should assess whether structured AKI detection and documentation improve kidney-related care and outcomes.

PMID:
42703057
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement