Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association between 6-month changes in 4-m usual gait time and social function domain score among community-dwelling older adults: a secondary analysis of a community-based program.

Created on 07 Sep 2026

Authors

Kenichi Hirashima, Haruo Uguisu, Mitsutaka Shibuya, Masato Wakamatsu

Published in

Journal of physical therapy science. Volume 38. Issue 9. Pages 394-400. Epub Sep 05, 2026.

Abstract

[Purpose] In this study, we aimed to examine whether within-person changes in physical function are associated with changes in the social function domain score among community-dwelling older adults participating in a municipal community program. [Participants and Methods] A secondary analysis was conducted using longitudinal data of 191 older adults who completed baseline and 6-month follow-up assessments. The social function domain score was calculated using four items from the Eleven-Check questionnaire. Physical function was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery. In addition, handgrip strength, Timed Up and Go, and 4-m maximum-pace gait time tests were performed. Changes in each variable were calculated as the 6-month follow-up value minus the baseline value. In addition, Spearman's rank correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. [Results] Changes in the 4-m usual gait time were significantly correlated with changes in the social function domain score. In a regression model adjusted for age and sex, changes in 4-m usual gait time were associated with changes in the social function domain score. The model explained 9.3% of the variance. [Conclusion] 6-month changes in 4-m usual gait time were associated with changes in the social function domain score among community-dwelling older adults.

PMID:
42703571
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement