Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Validity and reliability of Slovenian translation and adaptation of Eating Assessment Tool (SI-EAT-10) in oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Created on 08 Sep 2026

Authors

Marjeta Trček Kavčič, Gaj Vidmar, Blaž Koritnik, Irena Hočevar Boltežar, Nataša Bizovičar

Published in

Disability and rehabilitation. Pages 1-12. Sep 07, 2026. Epub Sep 07, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Slovenian translation of The Eating Assessment Tool (SI-EAT-10) as a patient-reported measure of swallowing-related symptoms in adults with dysphagia.
The SI-EAT-10 was translated according to established guidelines and administered to 203 patients and 104 healthy controls. Content and criterion validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability was assessed. Criterion validity was evaluated through correlations with the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS).
Patients had higher SI-EAT-10 scores than heathy controls (median 7 vs. 0). The threshold of ≥ 3 points showed 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity (AUC = 0.96). Strong correlations were found with FOIS (ρ = -0.84) and PAS (ρ = -0.89). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.97). Internal consistency was very high in patients (λ2 =0.90) and moderate in healthy controls (λ2 = 0.69). Content validity was rated as adequate.
The SI-EAT-10 is a reliable and valid self-assessment instrument with strong psychometric characteristics. It is a useful patient-reported outcome measure for clinical and research use in Slovenian-speaking populations, with relevance for evaluating swallowing-related symptoms, supporting further diagnostic procedures, and rehabilitation planning.

PMID:
42704773
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement