Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

YouTube as a Learning Tool for Urethral Catheterization: A Content and Quality Analysis.

Created on 08 Sep 2026

Authors

Asuman Çobanoğlu, Yesim Yaman Aktas

Published in

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN. Sep 04, 2026. Epub Sep 04, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the content and quality of existing YouTube videos on the urethral catheterization procedure. The study used a descriptive research design. Forty-one (41) videos were examined on YouTube. Urethral Catheterization Skill Checklist, DISCERN, Global Quality Standard (GQS), and JAMA were used to collect the study data. Among the videos included in the study, 51.2% were for female patients and 48.8% were for male patients. Content analysis revealed that critical procedural steps were frequently omitted in a substantial proportion of the videos: hand hygiene was not addressed in 22% of the videos, preprocedure information was not provided in 10.1%, latex allergy screening was absent in 82.9%, patient privacy was not ensured in 12.2%, and adherence to aseptic principles was not demonstrated in 7.3%. No statistically significant relationship was found between DISCERN, GQS, and JAMA scores and popularity variables such as video duration, year of upload to YouTube, views, and likes (P>.05). The urethral catheterization videos evaluated in this study were generally of moderate quality; however, they exhibited notable shortcomings with respect to scientific reliability and adherence to standard procedural steps. Accordingly, online instructional videos should be developed in a more reliable, evidence-based, and professionally standardized manner.

PMID:
42704648
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement