Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Clinical Frontiers and Applications Progress of ctDNA in Precision Treatment
of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Created on 08 Sep 2026

Authors

Hongmin Yu, Hua Qiao, Jie Li, Liyan Du

Published in

Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer. Volume 29. Issue 7. Pages 509-517. Jul 20, 2026.

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) enables minimally invasive, repeatable assessment of tumor burden and molecular evolution and is an important candidate biomarker for precision management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review summarizes current evidence on assay strategies, perioperative dynamics, molecular residual disease (MRD) after curative-intent treatment, relapse surveillance, and applications in unresectable stage III disease. The most consistent evidence shows that detectable ctDNA after definitive treatment is associated with a substantially increased risk of recurrence, whereas longitudinally undetectable MRD identifies lower-risk populations more reliably than a single negative result. ctDNA clearance during neoadjuvant therapy is associated with pathological response and long-term outcomes but cannot replace pathology or imaging. In oncogene-driven disease, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC has MRD evidence from samples collected in a randomized trial; a small prospective postoperative study has provided direct MRD evidence in early-stage anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- or ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1)-fusion-positive disease, although the evidence base remains limited; Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), GTPase specific postoperative MRD studies remain insufficient. When pathology, imaging, and ctDNA are discordant, assay validity should first be confirmed and lesion-directed imaging or tissue confirmation pursued according to the suspected relapse pattern; ctDNA alone should not trigger deviation from standard therapy. ctDNA has substantial clinical validity, but routine treatment decisions still require standardized analytical performance, cross-platform reproducibility, and prospective evidence of clinical utility.
.

PMID:
42705853
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement