Time Windows Analysis of Perfluorobutane-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign vs. Malignant Superficial Lymphadenopathy.

Authors

Jiu-Yi Ma, Ying Fu, Xiang-Mei Chen, Lan Zeng, Fang Mei, Hao-Yue Niu, Li-Gang Cui

Published in

Academic radiology. Sep 07, 2026. Epub Sep 07, 2026.

Abstract

To investigate the optimal time window of the postvascular phase of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with superficial lymphadenopathy.
This study retrospectively analyzed 150 suspicious LNs in the superficial area from 141 patients. All LNs were evaluated by the postvascular phase of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasound at a dose of 0.4-0.6 mL and a mechanical index range of 0.18-0.21. Quantitative parameters, including peak intensity (PI) and mean postvascular phase intensity (MPI), were obtained at 6, 8, and 10 min post-injection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed at each time point. Area under the curve (AUC) differences between earlier time points and the 10 min assessment were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Diagnostic performance and classification stability were further assessed using the 10 min cutoff.
PI and MPI were significantly lower in malignant LNs than in benign LNs at all three time points. For PI, the AUCs were 0.919, 0.942, and 0.949 at 6, 8, and 10 min, respectively. For MPI, the corresponding AUCs were 0.936, 0.933, and 0.940. In the exploratory AUC based comparison with 10 min, PI at 6 min was not within the exploratory margin, whereas PI at 8 min and MPI at both 6 and 8 min were within the margin. When the 10 min cutoff was applied to earlier measurements, the 6 min assessment showed reduced sensitivity and lower classification agreement, whereas the 8 min assessment showed more stable classification relative to 10 min CONCLUSIONS: In suspicious superficial LNs evaluated with perfluorobutane enhanced ultrasound, quantitative postvascular phase assessment showed good diagnostic performance. However, the 6 min assessment showed less stable classification, while the 8 min assessment may represent a more reliable earlier observation time point under this specific imaging protocol.

PMID:
42705924
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.