Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

An Instrumental Optimization of a Label-Free Proteomic Method for Trace Protein Input.

Created on 08 Sep 2026

Authors

Dongyoon Shin, Sumin Lee, Sohyun Yang, Jeongwoo Hong, Da-Yeon Lee, Young June Jeon, Amos Chungwon Lee, Youngsoo Kim, Han Suk Ryu, Junho Park

Published in

Analytical chemistry. Volume 98. Issue 35. Pages 25721-25740. Sep 08, 2026.

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based proteomics of trace-level samples, such as tens of cells or spatially resolved tissue regions, offers unique biological insights but is often constrained by the requirement for specialized, costly instrumentation. In this study, we developed a scalable workflow for the deep proteomic analysis of low- to ultralow-input samples by systematically optimizing a widely adopted Orbitrap and UHPLC platform to maximize sensitivity, precision, and throughput. This optimized workflow identified over 5600 proteins from 5 ng of peptides and 3400 proteins from 20 sorted cells, achieving a throughput of 30 analyses per day while maintaining deep proteome coverage and high quantitative reproducibility. Furthermore, by applying this method to spatially resolved proteomics, we identified over 6100 proteins from microscale regions of interest (ROIs) within a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. A data-driven normalization strategy was employed to correct for variable cellularity across tissue regions, effectively revealing intratumor heterogeneity and distinct molecular and functional signatures, including pathway activations not apparent in parallel spatial transcriptomic analysis. Ultimately, this accessible, high-performance method substantially lowers the instrumentation barrier for the deep proteomic profiling of trace-level biological samples.

PMID:
42708762
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement