Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Environmental and occupational exposure in newly diagnosed lung cancer- data from the PROTEON study.

Created on 08 Sep 2026

Authors

Anne Sibille, Jessica Hendrick, Aurore Cue Alvarez, Marie Ernst, Laurence Seidel, Bernard Duysinx, Renaud Louis, Jean-Louis Corhay

Published in

Expert review of respiratory medicine. Sep 08, 2026. Epub Sep 08, 2026.

Abstract

Environmental (E) and occupational (O) lung cancer (LC) is under-reported. Raising the awareness for this problem could help optimize prevention and screening.
In 181 consecutive non-small cell LC patients (January 2023-December 2024, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium) E risk factors (RF) and ORF were collected through a self-reporting questionnaire (open and direct questions) with sociodemographic, tumor- and work-related data. The primary objective was to identify ERF and ORF prevalence.
Mean age was 68.2 ± 8.8 years, 55.8% males, 93.4% (former) smokers. Half of the patients (53%) lived in (peri-)urban areas. 50% disclosed an obstructive airway disease and 31.5% had a positive LC family history. Of the 270 jobs registered, 78.5% were manual. Only 23.8% of the workers used protective equipment. 72.4% of the patients reported exposure to at least one ORF through direct questions and the most frequent pulmonary carcinogens were asbestos (36.5%), silica (22.1%), welding fumes (15.5%), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (14.9%) and diesel engine exhaust (14.4%). Overall, 93.9% of patients reported at least one E/ORF other than tobacco. A request for compensation was introduced in <3% of the patients.
Non-tobacco RF for LC are virtually always present in non-small cell LC patients and under-reported.
The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 5,602,259).

PMID:
42708503
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 25
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement