Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Use of Rituximab in Pemphigus among Indian Dermatologists: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Survey.

Created on 08 Sep 2026

Authors

Dipankar De, Narayanan Baskaran, Rahul Mahajan, Abir Saraswat, Deepika Pandhi, Geeti Khullar, Kolalapudi Seetharam Anjaneyulu, Manas Chatterjee, Manjunath Shenoy, Murlidhar Rajagopalan, Nayeem Sadath Haneef, Nilay Kanti Das, Raghavendra Rao, Sheetanshu Kumar, Shekhar Neema, Shyamanta Barua, Sujay Khandpur, Vinay Keshavamurthy, Vishal Gupta, Sanjeev Handa

Published in

Indian dermatology online journal. Sep 07, 2026. Epub Sep 07, 2026.

Abstract

Rituximab has changed the paradigm for management of pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Despite its widespread use, variability exists in its use, particularly related to dosing protocols, prophylaxis, and use in special populations. This study aimed to assess dermatologists' knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding rituximab in India.
A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Indian dermatologists with at least six months of clinical experience post-residency between March and June 2024. An 85-question survey was used to gather information on knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to rituximab. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the data and identify practice variations.
Fifty-five dermatologists with a mean practice experience of 13 years participated. Most (78.2%) preferred rituximab as first-line adjuvant for PV, citing higher remission rates and fewer long-term adverse effects. Knowledge of rituximab's mechanism of action was excellent. However, significant practice variability was observed. The standard dose rheumatoid arthritis protocol for moderate-to-severe disease was preferred by 69.1%, whereas only 14.5% strongly supported low-dose regimens. Screening for latent tuberculosis was commonly performed (80%). Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and vaccination practices were inconsistent, with only 12.7% always prescribing prophylaxis. Additionally, 61.8% used rituximab retreatment on clinical relapse, with less emphasis on immunological markers for monitoring.
The responses may not be representative of all dermatologists, especially those with less experience with rituximab.
While dermatologists demonstrated strong knowledge of rituximab, significant variability in dosing, prophylaxis, and retreatment practices exists. Standardized guidelines and educational initiatives may be needed to ensure consistent use of rituximab and improve patient outcomes.

PMID:
42708833
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement