Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Examining Electronic Health Records to Investigate Sex Differences in Oral Diseases and Conditions.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Emma Fetchko, Linda Sangalli, Ariadne Letra

Published in

Clinical and experimental dental research. Volume 12. Issue 5. Pages e70455.

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism has been shown to influence disease predisposition and/or progression, although population-based studies in dental, oral, and craniofacial (DOC) diseases and conditions are limited. This study aimed to identify sex-based differences in DOC diseases/conditions using two large health data repositories.
Retrospective cross-sectional study of health record data obtained from adult participants (> 18 years old) in the NIH All of Us Research Program (n = 254,700) and the BigMouth Data Repository (n ≈ 4.7 million). The number of males and females presenting each selected condition in each database was recorded. Sex-specific association analysis for each condition was performed using chi-square tests (α ≤ 0.0002). Female-to-male odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals were also calculated.
Significant sex-related differences were found for 61/87 concepts (70%), with 33 concepts (54%) showing female bias and 28 (46%) showing male bias (p ≤ 0.0002). Analysis of BigMouth data showed sex bias for 90/230 (39%) concepts investigated, of which 87 (97%) showed female bias and 3 (3%) showed male bias (p ≤ 0.0002).
This study provides evidence of sex bias in numerous oral and dental conditions in the populations studied. Additional studies in other populations might provide further insight into the role of sexual dimorphism in these conditions.

PMID:
42709938
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement