Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Kinetics of the PASC Index in Long COVID.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Kyungsup Kwon, Choi Young Jang, Woori Kim, JuYeon Son, Euijin Chang, Sung-Han Kim

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 9. Pages e0357670. Epub Sep 08, 2026.

Abstract

The post‑acute sequelae of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection (PASC, "Long COVID") remain difficult to evaluate because standardized diagnostic tools are limited. We applied the recently proposed PASC index (score ≥ 12) to describe the 12‑month trajectory of Long COVID symptoms.
In this prospective cohort, adults with laboratory‑confirmed COVID‑19 were consecutively enrolled from November 2022 to February 2025. Long COVID was defined by a PASC index of ≥12 across 12 symptom domains persisting for at least 30 days post-infection. Symptom questionnaires were completed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after infection.
Among 183 participants, 48 (26.2%) met Long COVID criteria. Symptom assessments indicated that the proportion of participants meeting the Long COVID threshold declined from 27% at 1 month to 18% at 12 months, although this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.16). Participants classified as having Long COVID had consistently higher PASC index values across follow-up, while pairwise within-person comparisons showed no significant temporal changes in either the Long COVID or non-Long COVID group. These findings suggest that the overall symptom burden remained relatively stable over time, despite fluctuations in threshold status.
During 12 months of follow-up, approximately one quarter of participants met the PASC index threshold at least once. Among participants with repeated assessments, PASC index scores showed limited within-person change, although differential non-response limits the interpretation of temporal prevalence estimates.

PMID:
42709774
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 21
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement