Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

How Slow Should You Go? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Resistance Training Repetition Tempo on Muscle Hypertrophy.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Alysson Enes, Alec Piñero, Tom Hermann, Arman Zamanzadeh, Tran Hennessy, Daniel Montenegro, Chris Parnell, Albert Jia, Tami Weitzman, Milo Wolf, Patroklos A Korakakis, Paul A Swinton, Brad J Schoenfeld

Published in

Journal of strength and conditioning research. Volume 39. Issue 12. Pages 1331-1339. Dec 01, 2025.

Abstract

Enes, A, Piñero, A, Hermann, T, Zamanzadeh, A, Hennessy, T, Montenegro, D, Parnell, C, Jia, A, Weitzman, T, Wolf, M, Korakakis, PA, Swinton, PA, and Schoenfeld, BJ. How slow should you go? A systematic review with meta-analysis of the effect of resistance training repetition tempo on muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 39(12): 1331-1339, 2025-We systematically searched the literature for interventions that compared different resistance training tempos for eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) actions. We estimated pre-/poststudy changes and between-condition differences in lean/muscle mass for healthy adults, restricting inclusion to studies that controlled all other training variables. Hierarchical meta-analyses were conducted within a Bayesian framework, with change estimates made within groups, and the primary emphasis placed on pairwise differences between dichotomously coded slower (repetition time: 1.7-4.5 seconds, averaging ∼3.5 seconds) and faster (repetition time: 0.3-2 seconds, averaging ∼1 second) interventions. When combining data across all 14 included studies (4 CON and 9 ECC manipulated interventions, 1 for both in a cross-over design), meta-analyses of within-group changes showed similar pooled effects for faster (0.43 [95% CrI: 0.29‒0.58]) and slower tempos (0.34 [95% credible interval (CrI): 0.22‒0.47)]. Meta-analyses of pairwise differences across the same studies showed central estimates that trivially favored faster over slower tempos (pooled mean = 0.09 [95% CrI: -0.04 to 0.22]), with a low probability that the between-condition effect size was at least small (p = 0.450), medium (p = 0.001), or large (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of pairwise differences stratified by muscle action type (ECC or CON), body region (upper or lower body), and training to failure (yes or no) generally produced trivial to small effects, although the certainty of estimates varied across analyses. In conclusion, resistance training tempo appears to have minimal overall effect on muscle hypertrophy, with potential differences emerging under specific conditions.

PMID:
42709703
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement