Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

What students ask matters: Static and longitudinal questioning patterns in student-LLM dialogue and self-reported cognitive engagement.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Jingru Qu, Ling Dai, Mengjie Yin

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 9. Pages e0356183. Epub Sep 08, 2026.

Abstract

This study examines students' questioning as an interaction mechanism in student-LLM philosophical dialogue and how it relates to self-reported critical thinking (CT) and creative thinking (CrT) engagement. Participants were 106 first-year postgraduate students in a Chinese university general education course who completed an end-of-semester assignment using an institutional ChatGPT model embedded in the learning platform. Student questions in dialogue transcripts were coded into six categories aligned with the revised Bloom's taxonomy. We then applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify static questioning profiles and group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to capture longitudinal development across conversation rounds, followed by subgroup comparisons on perceived CT and CrT. LPA yielded three profiles: Fact-focused, Explanation-focused, and Evaluation-focused Questioners. GBTM revealed two trajectories with a key divergence around Rounds 5-7: some students plateaued at application and analytical questioning, while others progressed toward evaluative and exploratory questioning. Fact-focused Questioners reported lower CT and CrT engagement scores; plateauing trajectories reported lower CT. Findings highlight how questioning patterns are associated with differential self-reported cognitive engagement in student-LLM dialogue and inform scaffold design to promote higher-order inquiry.

PMID:
42709768
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement