Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Heritability and social interaction in labor market outcomes: Evidence from the population of twins in the United States.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

David Card, Jesse Rothstein, Moises Yi

Published in

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Volume 123. Issue 37. Pages e2620927123. Sep 15, 2026. Epub Sep 08, 2026.

Abstract

We use data on 44,000 twin pairs observed as adolescents in the 2000 Census, linked to their earnings 20 y later, to study the heritability of labor market outcomes. We extend the Classical Twins Design (CTD), which identifies heritability from contrasts between monozygotic and dizygotic twins, to settings where an analyst does not observe zygosity but can measure outcomes for same-sex and opposite-sex twins. We also allow for the presence of a family- and sex-specific component affecting same-sex siblings but only partly shared by opposite-sex siblings. Our extended model identifies heritability from the difference-in-differences of same-sex vs. opposite-sex twins vs. siblings. The estimates indicate strong heritability (h-sq = 0.36) of log earnings. Using an AKM [J. M. Abowd et al., Econometrica 67, 251-333 (1999)] decomposition that separates the person-specific component of earnings from employer-specific pay premiums, we find that both components are heritable. The heritability of employer pay premiums, however, is mainly driven by same-sex twins who work at the same firm, suggesting that social interactions may lead to an overestimate of the genetic component in earnings. Excluding siblings who work together leads to estimates of the heritability of log earnings that are 15% lower. Similar biases may be present in CTD-based estimates of heritability for other social outcomes like education.

PMID:
42709798
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 33
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement