Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Clinical and pathological factors guide patient selection for electrochemotherapy in veterinary oncology in the absence of validated biomarkers.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Urša Lampreht Tratar, Maja Čemažar, Gregor Serša, Nataša Tozon Mask

Published in

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. Pages 1-9. Sep 08, 2026. Epub Sep 08, 2026.

Abstract

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a well-established local cancer treatment that combines the administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with the application of short electric pulses to enhance intracellular drug uptake. Over the past 3 decades, ECT has become an accepted therapeutic modality in both human and veterinary oncology for the treatment of a wide range of superficial and deep-seated tumors. Although favorable response rates have been reported across many tumor types, treatment outcomes remain variable among patients and neoplasms. Currently, patient selection is based primarily on clinical and pathological factors, while validated predictive biomarkers are lacking. This review summarizes the evidence regarding factors influencing ECT response in veterinary oncology, including tumor histotype, size, local invasiveness, clinical stage, previous treatments, immunohistochemical and molecular markers, and tumor blood perfusion. Available data indicate that smaller tumors, lower disease burden, and earlier intervention are associated with improved outcomes, whereas recurrent and advanced-stage tumors show reduced responsiveness. Future research integrating molecular profiling, immune characterization, functional imaging, and liquid biopsy approaches may facilitate the development of predictive biomarkers and support a more personalized application of ECT in veterinary cancer patients.

PMID:
42710536
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 27
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement