Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Patient acceptability and preferences for communication of coronary artery calcification findings in the NHS targeted lung health checks: a qualitative study.

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Abbey Louise Fletcher, Alan Bagnall, Yitka Graham

Published in

BMJ open. Volume 16. Issue 9. Pages e115544. Sep 08, 2026. Epub Sep 08, 2026.

Abstract

To explore how participants in the UK's Targeted Lung Health Check (TLHC) programme understand and respond to incidental findings of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and to identify patient preferences for communication that might enhance engagement with cardiovascular prevention such as lipid-lowering therapy (LLT).
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.
One general practice participating in the National Health Service TLHC programme in North-East England, an area of high social deprivation.
Ten adults aged 59-71 years with CAC detected on TLHC CT scans and a calculated QRISK >10%.
To explore patient understanding of incidental CAC findings and how this influences engagement with cardiovascular prevention.
To identify patient preferences for receiving and discussing CAC results, including preferred communication methods, terminology and the role of the clinician in shaping preventive treatment decisions.
Patients initially reported understanding their findings but deeper exploration revealed misconceptions about personal cardiovascular disease risk. A lack of trust in doctors and reliance on non-clinical information sources (social media, family and friends) were barriers to LLT uptake. Trust in the medical professional giving the advice also shaped acceptance of LLT.
Enhancing patient education on CAC findings, fostering doctor-patient trust and tailoring communication strategies may improve LLT uptake. Personalised follow-up and clearer risk explanations could reduce hesitancy and improve engagement with preventive care.

PMID:
42711077
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement