Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Analysis a patient with Dubin-Johnson syndrome due to a rare c.4120C>T nonsense variant of ABCC2 gene].

Created on 09 Sep 2026

Authors

Li Xiao, Xiaowei Zhu, Rongrong Dou, Aihua Huang, Yonglin Yang

Published in

Zhonghua yi xue yi chuan xue za zhi = Zhonghua yixue yichuanxue zazhi = Chinese journal of medical genetics. Volume 43. Issue 10. Pages 764-768. Oct 10, 2026.

Abstract

To report on a case of Dubin-Johnson syndrome (DJS) with a rare ABCC2 nonsense variant.
Clinical, histopathological, MRP2 immunohistochemical, and whole-exome sequencing findings were retrospectively analyzed. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Taizhou People's Hospital (Ethics No.: 20250522).
A 58-year-old woman with mild conjugated hyperbilirubinemia with normal aminotransferases and cholestatic enzymes, and black liver was incidentally discovered during laparoscopy. Histology showed melanin-like pigment deposition, and MRP2 immunohistochemistry was negative. Two heterozygous ABCC2 variants, namely c.2063T>C and c.4120C>T, were identified. The previously unreported nonsense variant c.4120C>T was predicted to truncate the MRP2 protein within the second nucleotide-binding domain (NBD2). Retrospective analysis of SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 had not identified any pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants for Rotor syndrome. As family samples were unavailable, the allelic phase of the two ABCC2 variants could not be determined.
The clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical findings in the woman had supported the diagnosis of DJS. The two unphased heterozygous ABCC2 variants provided supportive molecular evidence, but confirmation of biallelic involvement requires further segregation or phase analysis.

PMID:
42711131
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement